← All explanationsCairo recession classification

What do RT1, RT2 and RT3 mean in gum recession?

The Cairo classification groups gingival recessions by loss of tissue attachment between the teeth and on the outer surface of the affected tooth. The types are RT1, RT2 and RT3. They do not simply state how many millimetres of root are visible.

For training & practice ↓
SMILE meets DESIGN
Fictional depiction of an exposed tooth root and surrounding gingiva; interdental attachment measurements are not shown.AI-generated
Recession image · not an RT1 classification
01 / 03

RT1: no interproximal loss

RT1 has no loss of attachment between the teeth. The outer root may still be exposed. Visible recession and tissue attachment are different measurements.

02 / 03

RT2: compare the loss

RT2 includes attachment loss between teeth that is no greater than attachment loss on the outer tooth surface. The comparison matters, not just the visible length.

03 / 03

RT3: greater interproximal loss

In RT3, interproximal attachment loss exceeds the outer-surface loss. This informs assessment of possible root coverage. A category alone neither guarantees nor rules out a specific treatment.

Read the full explanation
  1. RT1: no interproximal loss

    RT1 has no loss of attachment between the teeth. The outer root may still be exposed. Visible recession and tissue attachment are different measurements.

  2. RT2: compare the loss

    RT2 includes attachment loss between teeth that is no greater than attachment loss on the outer tooth surface. The comparison matters, not just the visible length.

  3. RT3: greater interproximal loss

    In RT3, interproximal attachment loss exceeds the outer-surface loss. This informs assessment of possible root coverage. A category alone neither guarantees nor rules out a specific treatment.

Notes on the teaching images
  • Recession image · not an RT1 classification
  • No RT2 classification without attachment comparison
  • This image alone does not establish RT3

At a glance

Is RT a length?

No; it is a recession type.

Measurements needed?

Yes.

Certain outcome prediction?

No; the type is one factor.

Knowledge in motion

Explained in 36 seconds.

Three steps. No audio.
Each scene can also be selected manually.

Cairo recession classification: short film

Silent educational film with German on-screen text and simplified teaching images. Not a patient case or a promised treatment outcome. The full English explanation is available as text.

Often confused

Recession depth or Cairo type?

Recession depth is the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the gingival margin. Cairo type compares attachment loss on different tooth surfaces.

Quick answers
Does RT3 mean three millimetres of recession?

No. The number identifies a category, not a length.

Can I identify the type from a photograph?

Not reliably. Clinical attachment measurements at several sites are needed.

Does RT1 guarantee complete root coverage?

No. The category supports prognosis but does not account for every factor affecting treatment.

At the practice

For the appointment

You can bring this question to your appointment:

Which recession type is present, and what other factors limit achievable root coverage?

Discuss your individual findings and whether a referral is appropriate.

Discuss your findingsAppointment selection at Doctolib
Meet Dr. Niusha Barahmand Pour ↗
Learning layer for training & practiceUnderstand terminology and deepen knowledge
Interproximal
Between neighbouring teeth.
Buccal
Towards the cheek or outer tooth surface.

Make the distinction

Recession depth is the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the gingival margin. Cairo type compares attachment loss on different tooth surfaces.

Knowledge questionWhat defines RT2?

For learning, not for assessing personal symptoms. Your answer is not stored or sent.

  1. Interproximal attachment loss is present but no greater than buccal loss
  2. Always two millimetres of recession
  3. Only absence of any attachment loss
View answer

Interproximal attachment loss is present but no greater than buccal loss

RT2 depends on the relationship between interproximal and buccal attachment loss.

Sources and context

Editorial research: . General information, not an individual diagnosis or treatment recommendation. Teaching illustrations are simplified and do not depict a patient case.